Infrastructure damage is meaningful through its consequences for communities:
service disruption, reduced accessibility, economic loss, and delayed recovery.
DM2L links physics-based damage models to functionality and recovery metrics
to support hazard-informed planning and resilience decision-making.
Core Research Focus
- Resilience metrics linking damage → functionality → recovery
- Recovery trajectory and restoration curve modeling
- Scenario-based planning for mitigation and adaptation
- Integration of lifeline disruptions and interdependency effects
- Decision support for infrastructure portfolios and communities
What Has Been Done
- Developed vulnerability and resilience assessment approaches for coastal communities under hurricane hazards
- Quantified sensitivity of community impacts to hazard interactions and infrastructure damage mechanisms
- Advanced frameworks that connect component-scale failure to community-scale outcomes
What We Are Doing Now
- Developing community-scale performance and recovery modeling with lifeline constraints
- Integrating cascading impacts from power–transportation interdependencies
- Building scalable evaluation tools for comparing mitigation and hardening scenarios
Strategic Plan
- Develop decision-ready resilience indicators and dashboard-ready outputs
- Enable recovery modeling that accounts for constrained resources and access limitations
- Support mitigation planning with cost-effective strategy evaluation
- Translate technical outputs into actionable guidance for planners and agencies
How This Connects
Community resilience synthesizes results from multi-hazard mechanics, lifeline resilience, and interdependency
modeling to deliver holistic, decision-ready assessments and planning insights.
Figure (TBA)